|The playing hall after Round 3 (Photo courtesy of Ong Yujing)|
Oh, and did I mention that you need to be above 20 to participate in the event? That’s what makes it even more appealing: No screaming kids running around the place, or haranguing the arbiters over the touch-move rules. Such a nice, quiet environment to play in, which makes me regret not having signed up for the 2017 edition.
|Return to the abyss, little ones|
Round 4 was held last Friday, and it was a series of well fought games for my team despite suffering a loss. Incidentally, I was paired against one of my ex-seniors, who was also an NUSH alumni. The last time we faced off under tournament conditions (if my memory doesn’t fail me) was during a team event at PJC in 2010.
Well, old comrades we may be, but that doesn’t make the subsequent clash any less intense:
What can we learn from this game?
- Sometimes, it is good to just maintain the tension instead of releasing it so early, especially if you have the advantage. The pawn exchange on move 15 gave Black an opportunity to free up his cramped position.
- In my bid to break the stalemate, I ended up opening the position and gave the enemy bishop pair free reign. It is a simple strategic mistake which we should learn from: The two bishops are king of the open battlefield!
- When in time trouble, it is best to keep things simple instead of playing so aggressively; 31. Qa5 was simply asking for trouble.
I end off with an anecdote: After the game, my opponent told me that I had become a much better player compared to when we faced off 8 years ago.
My reply? “Yeah I train quite a bit, but the only difference it makes is that I take a longer time to lose!”
Definitely, I am still making poor decisions in time trouble even after all these years of competitive chess. It’s something for me to work on, which shows how the learning never stops!