Two bishops are typically not considered advantageous in the following situations:
- When the advantage of the two bishops is neutralized by a weakness in the position (e.g. holes in pawn structure, exposed king).
- When the opponent has an advantage with greater significance than the two bishops (e.g. material superiority, rook on seventh rank, a pawn majority on one side of the board).
- When the position is so locked up that the two bishops are rendered immobile.
The first two points are self-explanatory: If you have the two bishops but your opponent is a Queen up, or your king is about to be mated in 3, then your advantage is as good as useless.
A less extreme example can be seen in Position 1:
Checkerboard 28 - Checkerboard 5
Kickoff 2015 Chess Tournament (Round 4)
|Position 1: Position after 28. Rd6|
Here Black has the bishop pair, but White also has a subtle advantage: He has better rook activity. He threatens to occupy the 7th rank via Rc7 or Rd7, and also plans on playing Be3, tying Black's rooks down to defending the backward b6 pawn. These elements serve to neutralize Black's two bishop advantage, despite the position being open. The entire game can be seen in Example 2 of our earlier article.
Point 3 occurs when the position becomes closed, leaving the bishops trapped behind a wall of pawns. Here, having a knight would be better as compared to the two bishops. In his book "Modern Chess Strategy", Pachman gives an example of how the bishop pair succumbs in obstacle-filled terrain:
|Position 2: White's bishops are trapped|
Here Black's minor pieces are superior because White's bishop pair are trapped by their own pawns. All Black needs to do is to place his knight on f4, and the bishops can do nothing to stop Black's king from walking into White's position.
However, such cases of both bishops being imprisoned by their own pawns are rare; often one bishop is trapped while the other is free to rake the diagonals. In this case, the opponent has two possible modes of operation:
- Put his pawns on the same colour as the stronger bishop, thus rendering both of them weak
- Get rid of the stronger bishop by trading pieces.
The former method is similar to what we have explained in Part 2, about restriction of enemy pieces. Here, it is used against the two bishops:
Sokolsky, Alexy - Kotov, Alexander
|Position 3: Position after 14. c4|
In this game Black has the bishop pair. His dark-squared bishop is weaker since it is trapped by friendly pawns, while the light-squared counterpart is not. White's plan here will be to put his pawns on light-squares to restrict Black's stronger bishop and close up the position.
The latter method is deployed in the next example, where White trades off Black's stronger bishop to make the strength of his knights more significant:
Through this 3 part series we have explored the powers and weaknesses of the two bishops. In an open game, they can be a powerful tool in suppressing enemy movement and supporting the advance of friendly forces. They are even more powerful if steps are taken to restrict the mobility of the enemy pieces. But at the same time, we have also seen how they can succumb to enemy knights in closed positions.
And thus, I wrap up this series of articles on the bishop pair. Now you know better how to handle them in a real game!
Part 1: http://nushsblackknights.blogspot.com/2015/05/foundations-of-two-bishops-part-1.html
Part 2: http://nushsblackknights.blogspot.com/2015/05/foundations-of-two-bishops-part-2.html
"The Bishop Pair" (Video Lecture) by IM Renier Castellanos, March 2015
"Modern Chess Strategy" by Ludek Pachman
"My System (21st Century Edition)" by Aaron Nimzowitsch